Robinson v. Warner
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETTINE, Chief Judge.
This is an action brought under 9 U. S.C. § 4 to compel the defendants to enter into a consolidated arbitration proceeding with the plaintiff. Defendant Warner (the architect) and defendant Benson (the contractor) each have separate contracts with the plaintiff in relation to the designing and building of plaintiff’s home in Rehoboth, Massachusetts, and each contract contains a broad arbitration clause in which disputes are to be submitted to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. There appears to be no dispute over the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Vigo Steamship Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. v. Docutel CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973
- In re the Arbitration between Commercial Solvents Corp. & Louisiana Liquid Fertilizer Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- In re the Arbitration between Symphony Fabrics Corp. & Bernson Silk Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Penn Tanker Co. of Delaware v. C.H.Z. Rolimpex, WarszawaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gavlik Construction Co. v. H. F. Campbell Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S. A. v. Nereus Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Milwaukee Typographical Union No. 23 v. Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. v. Architectural Stone Co., Inc., a Louisiana Corporation, and State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.