Brice v. National Bondholders Corp.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
The failure of the petition to allege that the plaintiff therein was the holder of the note was not pointed out by demurrer, and so far as the record shows was mentioned by plaintiff in error for the first time in his brief in this court. The absence of an allegation that the plaintiff was the holder of the note was an amendable defect and was cured by verdict. The note was indorsed in blank. For the purposes of this.case we shall assume that National Bondholders Corporation acquired whatever rights Mortgage Guarantee Company of America had. This ruling is not in conflict with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Sheppard v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Georgia Southern Railroad v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Massell Realty Co. v. HanburySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Morgan v. ArgardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hadaway v. HadawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Motz v. Alropa CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Miller v. RackleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- South v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Hood v. ConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.