Legal Opinion

Vail v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 2, 2014No. Case No. 12-CV-6125 (KMK)PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Andrew Vail, pro se, brought the instant Action in August 2012, and currently alleges three causes of action related to medical treatment he received while incarcerated under the care of the New York City Department of Corrections. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

The events giving rise to this action occurred on September 2, 2010, while Plaintiff was incarcerated at the Anna M. Kross Center (“AMKC”)…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Jones v. Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Samuels v. FischerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Kucharczyk v. Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Mazzone v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  5. Adar Bays, LLC v. Genesys Id, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API