Legal Opinion

El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 3, 1999No. 98-6PublishedCited by 295 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter

The issue is whether the judicially created doctrine of tribal-court exhaustion, requiring a district court to stay its hand while a tribal court determines its own jurisdiction, should apply in this case, which if brought in a state court would be subject to removal. We think the exhaustion doctrine should not extend so far.

I

With the object of “encouraging] the private sector to become involved in the development of atomic energy for peaceful purposes,” Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc., 488 U. S. 59, 68 (1978), Congress passed the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA), 68…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by295 opinions

  1. Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Dion Strong v. Alphonso DavidCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API