Legal Opinion

McGann Mfg. Co. v. Ruggles-Coles Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 9, 1930No. 4278Published

1Per curiam

In the Court below, the Ruggles-Coles Engineering Company, hereafter called plain*1006tiff, charged the MeGann Manufacturing Company, Inc., Robert G. MeGann and William J. Kuntz, inter alia, with infringement of Patent No. 1,229,978, granted June 12, 1917, for a drier. On final hearing, the court below, in an opinion [34 F.(2d) 519] in substance found that the charge that Kuntz, the patentee, bad assigned the patent to the plaintiff under duress, was not true, that the patent was infringed and that MeGann and Kuntz were’personally liable as defendants. The opinion thoroughly discusses every phase…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ruggles-Coles Engineering Co. v. McGann Engineering Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API