Legal Opinion
Mohr v. BF GOODRICH RUBBER COMPANY
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 16, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
147 N.J. Super. 279 (1977)
371 A.2d 288
ROBERT W. MOHR AND DOROTHY MOHR, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
B.F. GOODRICH RUBBER COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 16, 1977.
Decided February 8, 1977.
Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.
Mr. Samuel C. Inglese argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Moss and Inglese, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas T. Chappell argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lamb, Hutchinson, Chappell, Ryan & Hartung, attorneys; Mr. Thomas T. Chappell, of counsel; Ms. Mary B. Rogers on the brief).
2Per curiam
This is a product…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- State v. WilbelySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Scanlon v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Moraca v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Polyard v. TerryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Smith v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Navarro v. George Koch & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- State v. FreemanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.