Legal Opinion

Moraca v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 6, 1975PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Sullivan, J.

In this products liability case involving a Lincoln Continental which was six months old at the time of the one car accident, a judgment in favor of defendants based upon a jury verdict of no cause was reversed by the Appellate Division, one judge dissenting, on the ground that the trial court’s charge to the jury was erroneous. A new trial on liability was ordered. See Moraca v. Ford Motor Co., 132 N. J. Super. 117 (1974). Because of the dissent, defendants appeal as of right. R. 2:2~l(a) (2). We affirm substantially for the reasons…

2Cited by64 opinions

  1. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Cassisi v. Maytag Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API