Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 10, 1993PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certification, 130 N.J. 399, 614 A.2d 620 (1992), to consider whether the Appellate Division had correctly ordered yet another retrial of this fifteen-year-old action based on errors in the trial court’s jury charge. With but one modification we affirm the judgment below substantially on the basis of the Appellate Division opinion. See Feldman v. Lederle Lab., 257 N.J.Super. 163, 608 A.2d 356 (1992). Our disagreement is limited to so much of that court’s opinion as addressed the admissibility of a notation on a letter — the “Swanzey notation.”

I

Plaintiff’s complaint, originally…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Long v. LandySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. Campos v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Savage v. Old Bridge-Sayreville Medical GroupSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. McDarby v. Merck & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  3. R.F. v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  4. State v. BlakneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API