Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Wittbank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1859PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The appellee, who was the plaintiff, sued Sloan and Fordyce upon a promissory note for the payment of 400 dollars. The note bears date Mmch 7,1857, was payable to the order of Walters and Cummings at six months, and was by them assigned to the plaintiff.

Demurrer to the complaint overruled. This ruling is assigned for error; but as no exception appears to have been taken to the refusal to sustain the demurrer; the error thus assigned is not properly before us.

Defendants answered in seven paragraphs, to which there were replies. And the cause being thus at issue, the defendants withdrew their…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sherwood & Roberts, Inc. v. RiplingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gunel v. CueIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. De Recat Corp. v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. McArthur v. LefflerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Kellenberger v. PerrinIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API