Legal Opinion
Beeman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 9, 2002No. 1079-01PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, WOMACK, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, J.J., joined.
Knowel Beeman was rear-ended while driving. No injuries occurred. The officer cited the other driver for following too closely and arrested Beeman for driving while intoxicated. Beeman refused a breath test, so the officer obtained a search warrant for his blood. Over Bee-man’s objections, his blood was drawn at the local hospital. We must determine *615whether the implied consent statute prohibits drawing a suspect’s blood under a search warrant. We conclude that it does not.
Procedural History
After being…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by172 opinions
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- State v. JohnstonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Daniel James Weems v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Antonio Aviles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Antonio Aviles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.