Tenneco Oil Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
This appeal involves the following question: Where actual notice of the prior existence of an oil and gas lease is imparted to one seeking to also obtain such a lease does the latter exercise “reasonable diligence” in inquiring as to the continued effectiveness of such lease where he limits his inquiry to questioning the intended lessor as to any outstanding leases? The trial court in effect answered such question in the negative. Under the circumstances herein we agree.
This action was commenced in the court below by the Humble Oil and Refining Company, as plaintiff, against…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Stevens v. PattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Lair v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Anthis v. SandlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Palmer v. Crews Lumber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Amarex, Inc. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Anson Corp. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- State v. Porky's Jungle Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.