Meyer v. Parobek
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
The facts are set forth in a stipulation. Plaintiffs were the owners of premises, known as 509, 511 and 515 Vista Way in Oceanside, leased to Dye-Trans Color Photo, Inc., a corporation. Defendants and appellants Balkema, Ostrow and Russell loaned to the corporation the sum of $25,000 and in return received from it a promissory note, secured by a chattel mortgage on the fixtures and equipment of the corporation. On or about August 1, 1950, the corporation ceased operations due to financial difficulties and the said fixtures and equipment were left on the premises. Shortly thereafter defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ross v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Chichester v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Ellingson v. Walsh, O'Connor & BarnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Richmond Wharf & Dock Co. v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Herond v. BonsallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parkmerced Co. v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization & Arbitration BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Long v. McJimseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Fitzgerald v. FishburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963