Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Fishburn

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1963No. Civ. 20553PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

Plaintiff minor and his father sought damages for injuries suffered by the son in the collision of his bicycle and defendant’s pickup truck. Verdict was for defendant. Plaintiffs’ motion for new trial was granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence (Code Civ. Proc., § 657, subd. 4). Defendant appeals.

The accident occurred between 6:45 and 7 p.m., October 15, 1959, at an unlighted intersection. There was sharply conflicting testimony as to the degree of visibility, some witnesses testifying that it was dark, and others that it was but dusk, with good visibility up to 100 yards. Sunset…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fomco, Inc. v. Joe Maggio, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Slemons v. PatersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hart v. FarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Akopiantz v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Santillan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Lubeck v. LopesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API