Legal Opinion

The Apple Ipod Itunes Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 19, 2011No. C 05-00037 JWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING AS PREMATURE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

JAMES WARE, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs 1 bring this class action against Defendant Apple Computer, Inc. (“Apple”), alleging violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and related state law claims. Plaintiffs allege that Apple has committed unlawful acts in issuing software updates for its iPod, in violation of federal and state antitrust laws.

Presently before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 2 and Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bookhouse of Stuyvesant Plaza, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Truinject Corp. v. Galderma S.A.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API