The Apple Ipod Itunes Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING AS PREMATURE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
JAMES WARE, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs 1 bring this class action against Defendant Apple Computer, Inc. (“Apple”), alleging violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and related state law claims. Plaintiffs allege that Apple has committed unlawful acts in issuing software updates for its iPod, in violation of federal and state antitrust laws.
Presently before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 2 and Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bookhouse of Stuyvesant Plaza, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Truinject Corp. v. Galderma S.A.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024