Commonwealth v. Neiswonger
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
In this case, appellant contests the admission into evidence of the opinion testimony of a police officer. The officer testified at a jury trial that, in his opinion, appellant was under the influence of alcohol “to a degree that rendered him incapable of safe driving.” Appellant was convicted; the trial court denied appellant’s motion for reconsideration of sentence, which was based on the theory that the testimony was inadmissible. We agree with the trial court that the testimony was admissible, and affirm the judgment of sentence.
Appellant was stopped by a police officer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lewis v. MellorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. AriziniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BoernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- In the Interest of WRIGHTSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. BowserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. KorenkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. RaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. YedinakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.