Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Neiswonger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1985No. 00539 Pittsburgh 1983PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

In this case, appellant contests the admission into evidence of the opinion testimony of a police officer. The officer testified at a jury trial that, in his opinion, appellant was under the influence of alcohol “to a degree that rendered him incapable of safe driving.” Appellant was convicted; the trial court denied appellant’s motion for reconsideration of sentence, which was based on the theory that the testimony was inadmissible. We agree with the trial court that the testimony was admissible, and affirm the judgment of sentence.

Appellant was stopped by a police officer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MellorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. AriziniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. BoernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. In the Interest of WRIGHTSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. BowserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. KorenkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. RaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. YedinakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API