Legal Opinion

Sallblad v. Burman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 1947No. 34,551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for amended findings or a new trial.

In his action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, plaintiff by his complaint alleged that at the “instance and request” of defendant he had furnished labor and material “of the reasonable value” of $1,155.34 in the rewiring and alteration of electrical lines and equipment of defendant’s business building in Minneapolis. In 1945, defendant contracted with plaintiff, an electrical contractor, to perform certain electrical work for an agreed price of $1,200. Plaintiff performed only a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. James E. Carlson, Inc. v. BablerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Meyer v. SaterbakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Lufkin v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. North Central Company v. Phelps Aero, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Bartl v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Elsberry v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Bartl v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API