Legal Opinion
Bartl v. City of New Ulm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 24, 1955No. 36,373Published
1Opinion of the Court
245 Minn. 148 (1955)
VICTOR W. BARTL
v.
CITY OF NEW ULM.[1]
No. 36,373.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 24, 1955.
Victor W. Bartl, pro se, and Carl Jensen, for appellant.
Mahoney & Mahoney, for respondent.
DELL, CHIEF JUSTICE.
Action to recover damages to a bulk oil storage plant allegedly caused by defendant's negligence. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in his favor on the ground that the damages awarded are inadequate.
Plaintiff was the owner of a bulk oil station situated adjacent to the municipal baseball field of the defendant, City of New Ulm. The station consisted of four large oil tanks and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoxsie v. Empire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Kopischke v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Timm v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Bartl v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Jovaag v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.