Legal Opinion

Crumpacker v. Crumpacker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 2, 1986No. 58,223PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

May contempt proceedings be used to enforce the payment of past due installments of court-ordered child support after the children have reached majority? That is the principal issue presented in this appeal.

The plaintiff, Shirley J. Crumpacker, and the defendant, John K. Crumpacker, were divorced in 1969. John was required to pay child support. The parties had a farming and dairy operation. The land and the bulk of the income producing assets were awarded to John, and Shirley was given a money judgment which was paid a few months after the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barton v. BartonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Amino Bros. v. Twin Caney Watershed (Joint) District No. 34Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. In re GrovesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BerrethSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Gibson v. BennettSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Jones v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. Cyr v. CyrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Marriage of Griffin v. ReeveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API