Legal Opinion

Pardo v. Mecum Auction Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 29, 2014No. 12 C 08410PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOHN J. THARP, Jr., United States District Judge

For the reasons stated below, defendant Mecum Auction’s motion to dismiss [112] is granted in part and denied in part. The fraud and misrepresentation claims (Counts I, III, and IV) are dismissed with prejudice. The motion to dismiss the breach of contract and rescission claims (Counts II and VI) is denied. A status hearing is set for 1/28/15 at 9:00 a.m.

STATEMENT

According to the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), the factual allegations of which are accepted as true, plaintiff Isaac Pardo purchased a black 1967 Corvette coupe at Mecum’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connectors Realty Group Corporation, The v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  2. Connectors Realty Group Corporation, The v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  3. Full Circle Villagebrook GP, LLC v. PROTECH 2004-D, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. Ken Heritage, LLC v. Lake Plaza Property Holding, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Walls v. VRE Chicago Eleven, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API