Legal Opinion

Guynn v. McCauley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 35 opinions

APPEAL from White Circuit Court in Chancery. Hon. John Whytock, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

English, Ch. J.:

This suit was commenced the 22d March, 1869, on the Chancery side of the Circuit Court of White County, by James A. McCauley and wife, Nannie A. (formerly Bond), and James R. Bond.

In the original bill, Andrew B. Guynn, who claimed title to the lots in the Town of Searcy, which are the subject of litigation, was made defendant.

By an amended bill, Pitchigrew T. Quarles and wife, Emily S., and Wm. G. Turner, representing (as alleged) the estate of James Walker, deceased, under whom plaintiffs claimed the lots, and Robert J. Rogers, a tenant of Guynn’s, were made defendants.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King's Heirs and Others v. Thompson and WifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Shepherd v. BevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850
  3. Worthington v. McRobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  4. Bingham v. MaxcyIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Brooks v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Bevington v. BevingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Collins v. Paepcke-Leicht Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. El Dorado Ice & Planing Mill Co. v. KinardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API