Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Derr

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 5, 1983No. 81-3-386PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*448OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The sole issue before this Court is whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the Appellant’s conviction for criminal conspiracy. The facts pertinent thereto are as follows.

On March 11, 1977, the Appellant agreed to sell to an undercover narcotics agent of the Department of Justice, Bureau of Drug Control, one pound of hashish for the sum of $1,100.00. The Appellant also indicated to the undercover agent that the actual purchase would occur at another location, later identified as the residence of Eugene Szoka. Upon arrival at the Szoka residence, the Appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RouxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. SudlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. YobbagySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. DolfiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SwerdlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. SattazahnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. SavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API