Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dolfi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1979No. 63PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Emil Dolfi and co-defendants, Gaylord Rumble and Edith Marie Blewitt, were convicted in a nonjury trial of violating 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 903 (conspiracy) and 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5512 (lotteries). Following denial of the post-verdict motions, appellant was ordered to pay a fine of $1,000 and to undergo two years of probation. 1 Appellant’s petition for allowance of appeal to this Court was granted.

Appellant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him of conspiracy and, thus, of a violation of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5512 (lotteries). The test for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. RouxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. YobbagySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. GwaltneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. TingleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API