Commonwealth v. Dolfi
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
EAGEN, Chief Justice.
Appellant Emil Dolfi and co-defendants, Gaylord Rumble and Edith Marie Blewitt, were convicted in a nonjury trial of violating 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 903 (conspiracy) and 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5512 (lotteries). Following denial of the post-verdict motions, appellant was ordered to pay a fine of $1,000 and to undergo two years of probation. 1 Appellant’s petition for allowance of appeal to this Court was granted.
Appellant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him of conspiracy and, thus, of a violation of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5512 (lotteries). The test for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. RouxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. YobbagySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. GwaltneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. TingleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.