Snowden v. . Snowden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
In the recent case of Cullens v. Cullens, 161 N. C., 344, it was held that under a deed of lands made to a woman and her children, she and her children living at the date of the deed take as tenants in common. In that case Brown, J., says: “We think it well settled that where land is conveyed, as in this case, to a woman and her chil'dren, they take as tenants in common, and only those born at the date of the deed take unless there is one in ventre sa mere, and then such child would also take,” citing Dupree v. Dupree, 45 N. C., 164; Gay v. Baker, 58 N. C., 344; Heath v. Heath, 114 N. C.,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Campbell v. Everhart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Ziegler v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Dupree v. . DupreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
- Condor v. . SecrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mayberry v. . GrimsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Tate v. . AmosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941