Jung v. Jung
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Backes, Y. C.
The object of this bill is to annul a Nevada divorce on the ground of fraudulent imposition upon the court of that state. At the time the petition for divorce was filed, the Nevada statutes required a bona fide residence in the state, of the plaintiff or defendant, of not less than one year’ next preceding the commencement of the action, to confer jurisdiction upon its courts. Stat. (Nev.) 1-913 p. 10. The complainant and defendant in this cause lived in matrimonial relations in Camden county, in this state, from the time of their marriage in June, 1885, until July 13th, 1913,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Melnick v. MelnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Feickert v. FeickertNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Reik v. ReikNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Henry v. HenryNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Perlman v. PerlmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.