Legal Opinion

Fontaine v. Hunter

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided September 15, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGelinas, J.

This appeal raises the issue of the sufficiency of a trial judge’s findings of fact to support a judgment in the amount of $17,952.04 on plaintiff’s claim of $31,085.34. After trial in the Springfield Division the judge found the following as fact:

1. The Court finds that the Defendant owned multi-family dwelling units in Holy-oke, South Hadley and Southwick areas; that Robert Roy, acting as the agent of the Defendant was the property manager of said units and was responsible for their maintenance and upkeep, and that the said Robert Roy had an open account with the Plaintiff for the purchase…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schrottman v. BarnicleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Cormier v. CartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Jones v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Commonwealth vs. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Lindsey v. OgdenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stigum v. SkloffMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Draleau v. Crathern Engineering Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  3. Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Fruit Sever AssociatesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API