Legal Opinion
Stigum v. Skloff
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided March 3, 2000PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHershfang, J.
Introduction
In this suit on a note, the trial judge found for Defendant-Appellee Robert Skloff (“Defendant”). Plaintiff-AppellantEgil Stigum (“Plaintiff’) seeks to overturn thatfind-ing. Because Plaintiff hasnotproperly preserved his rights under the applicable appellate rules, we dismisshisappeal. Inany event, there isadequate evidence to support the trial judge’s factual conclusions.
The Requirements Of The District/Municipal Court Appellate Division Rules
To understandwhywe conclude thatPlaintiffhasnotproperlypreservedhisrightto appeal,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Marine Contractors Co. Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Stella v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Ashapa v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- O'BRIEN v. DwightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Scannell v. Ed. Ferreirinha & Irmao, Lda.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morris v. CentolaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- Casillo v. Worcester Area Transportation Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- Washington 138 LLC v. Reivax Properties, LLCMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- MacLeod v. DizazzoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- Discover Realty Corp. v. DavidMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.