Legal Opinion

Schrottman v. Barnicle

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 29, 1982PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

This case, which began as a claim of libel and invasion of privacy against a newspaper, an editor, and a reporter, was tried without jury before a judge of a District Court sitting by assignment in the Superior Court who found for the plaintiff against the reporter. The principal issue on appeal is whether the rule of Stone v. Essex County Newspapers, Inc., 367 Mass. 849 (1975), that a “private” person may recover for libel upon proof of negligence, should apply retroactively to the defendant’s newspaper article. We conclude that the Stone negligence standard should apply to this case and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Edgewood Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Abramian v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. King v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Jeffrey Kassel v. Gannett Co., Inc., D/B/A "Usa Today,"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API