Legal Opinion
Estee Lauder, Inc. v. Harco Graphics, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 21, 1984No. 82 Civ. 8188 (CBM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Estee Lauder, Inc. (Estee Lauder) has brought this action charging three defendants with violating the civil provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., as well as with common law fraud. Specifically, Estee Lauder has charged defendants Harco Graphics (Harco), Harry Aronson (Aronson) and -Perry Printing (Perry) with engaging in a pattern of racketeering activity predicated on violations of the federal mail fraud, federal racketeering and New York commercial bribery statutes, 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Riverbay Corp. v. SteinerNew York Supreme Court · 1989