Legal Opinion
Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 20, 1985No. 82 Civ. 1538(MEL)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Defendants Continental Grain Company (“Conti Grain”),. Walter M. Goldschmidt, and ContiCapital Management, Inc. (“Conti Management”) move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss as to them the fifth, twenty-first, and twenty-fourth claims alleged in plaintiff Mahmoud Fustok’s Second Amended Complaint.
The fifth and twenty-first claims assert implied private rights of action for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1-24 (1976 & Supp. III 1979). The fifth claim alleges that Conti Grain, Goldschmidt, and Conti Management,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rios v. Enterprise Ass'n Steamfitters, Local No. 638Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Compton v. IdeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Transamerica Delaval, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Von Bulow by Auersperg v. Von BulowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Kronfeld v. First Jersey National BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Cahill v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Grosser v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.