Legal Opinion

County of Bay v. Marvin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1929No. Docket Nos. 27 and 28, Calendar Nos. 34,360 and 34,359PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Defendant Marvin was sheriff of the county of Bay. In his first term of office defendant -¿Etna Casualty and Surety Company was surety on his official bond, and in his second term defendant Michigan Surety Company was surety. Federal prisoners were committed to the jail from time to time, for the board of whom the sheriff was paid 75 cents a day by the United States, in accordance with an agreement between the sheriff and the Federal government covering the matter. For the keeping of State prisoners the sheriff was paid by the county 15 cents per meal.

In these two suits instituted against the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Randolph v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  2. In re BirdsongDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1889
  3. Avery v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Ex parte ShoresDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1912
  5. Majors v. County of Lewis & ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holland, Jailer v. Fayette CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. MarsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Board of Supervisors v. DickerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API