Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Mars

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1941No. 29697PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

The board of county commissioners of Tulsa county, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, instituted this action in the district court of Tulsa county against A. Garland Mars, sheriff of Tulsa county, hereinafter referred to as defendant, as an action in mandamus to compel defendant to account to the county for certain funds received by him by way of profits for the feeding of federal prisoners confined in the county jail of Tulsa county. The alternative writ was issued, defendant filed his return and answer to the petition; the cause was tried to the court and a judgment was entered in favor…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Robertson v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. McCain v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. De Hasque v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Randolph v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1815

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BarnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. Oklahoma ex rel. ThilstedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. Opinion No. 74-192 (1975) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1975
  4. Opinion No. 75-258 (1975) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API