Board of Supervisors v. Dicker
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBittzel, J.
The purpose of Act No. 237, Pub. Acts 1919, as amended by Act No. 193, Pub. Acts 1921 (1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 1346), as clearly set forth in its title, is to authorize the “payment of salaries” for county officers “in lieu of fees.’’ It empowers the board of supervisors of each county to establish and pay salaries to certain officers, including the treasurer, and provides that such compensation “shall be compensation in full for all services performed by such” officers; that such officers shall collect and make itemized statements of all fees collected by them and pay them over to the treasurer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. ShieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Groesbeck v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- United States v. Van DuzeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- County of Montmorency v. PutnamMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Backus v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gammons v. ShaferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Livonia v. ClarkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Isaman v. Antrim County SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957