Legal Opinion

Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage District v. Certain Lands Within Said District Upon Which Drainage Taxes for the Year 1952 Have Not Been Paid

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 23, 1955PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Justice.

The appellant, Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage District, a corporation, filed its bill of complaint against “Certain Lands Within Said District Upon Which Drainage Taxes for the Year 1952 Have Not Been Paid” pursuant to the provisions of Section 298.75, F.S.1951, F.S.A. The prayer of the complaint was for an accounting to ascertain ■ the amount due and..owing plaintiff District for drainage taxes and costs in connection with the foreclosure “and that said amounts be decreed to be a first lien on the property against which certain drainage taxes were levied and assessed and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ready v. Safeway Rock CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  2. Ervin v. City of North Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Ervin v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Forcum, Receiver v. SymmesSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Early v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Sandstrom v. LeaderSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United StatesSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  4. Merkle v. Guardianship of JacobyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Robert Joe Long v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API