Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ervin v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 31, 1953PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

66 So.2d 816 (1953)

ERVIN, Atty. Gen.

v.

TAYLOR et al.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

July 31, 1953.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., Ralph M. McLane, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James J. English, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

Sibley & Davis, Miami Beach, and Ward & Ward, Miami, for appellees.

THOMAS, Justice.

A petition was filed in the chancery court by the appellees, all officials, seeking a declaration of their rights under Chapter 26807, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1951, and a determination of the constitutionality of that law.

No respondents or defendants were named in the petition. A few days…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Ervin v. City of North Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Figueroa Ferrer v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978
  2. Martinez v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Santa Rosa Cty. v. ADMIN. COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Bryant v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. North Shore Bank v. Town of SurfsideSupreme Court of Florida · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API