Legal Opinion

Early v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage Dist.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 21, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The respondent filed a bill of complaint 29 March 1933, to foreclose certain tax liens. Four years later the chancellor dismissed the cause so far as it affected a tract of land which had been erroneously included with those properties on which liens were alleged to exist.

According to the record no paper of any sort was thereafter filed in the case until 2 March 1953, when the attorney for the respondent filed a motion for “an order prescribing the form of notice to be given in this cause, the number of time [sic] which the same shall be published, the dates on which the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gulf Appliance Distributors v. LongSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Sudduth Realty Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Hartley's, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. HillSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage District v. Certain Lands Within Said District Upon Which Drainage Taxes for the Year 1952 Have Not Been PaidSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Fort Walton Lumber & Supply Company v. ParishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Adams Engineering Co. v. Construction Products Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API