Snyder v. Holt Manufacturing Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts aré stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
— The action is for damages, alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the defective construction of a combined harvester manufactured and sold to the plaintiff and one Kniebes by the defendant corporation. The plaintiff and said Kniebes were farmers near Crows Landing, in Stanislaus County, in the spring of 1896. By agreement between them, the plaintiff went to Stockton the latter part of April of that year, to make arrangements for a harvester to be used by them. The defendant was at that time, and for many years prior thereto had been, engaged in manufacturing and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by13 opinions
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Luitweiler Pumping Engine Co. v. Ukiah Water & Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Burch v. Valley Motor Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.