Legal Opinion

Wilson & Co. v. Curlett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Dawkins, J.). Action by John Curlett against Wilson and Company, a corporation, for the purchase price of canned tomatoes. Eiom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Thisi appeal is from a judgment of the Baltimore City Court recovered in the short note case against the appellant in an attachment proceeding.

In 191Y the appellee, John Curlett, was engaged in the canning business in Morattico, Virginia, and on the 5th of January of that year he entered into a contract, through his brokers or agents, W. E. Robinson & Co., of Belair, Maryland, with the appellant, to sell the appellant three thousand cases of “No. 3 hand packed tomatoes” at $1.05 per dozen,\ f. o. b. Morattico', Virginia, to be delivered when packed / during the season of 191Y. Among the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Franklin Fire Insurance v. Chicago Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  5. Allegre v. Maryland InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1824

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anne Arundel County v. Fraternal Order of Anne Arundel Detention Officers & PersonnelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Eisel v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. United States Ex Rel. Baltimore Brick Co. v. John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1945
  4. Tidewater Portland Cement Co. v. LincolnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API