Allegre v. Maryland Insurance
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from Baltimore co'lihty court: Covenatit on á policy of insurance. Pléá, Non irifregit conventionerm Thé facts are sufficiently stated iii the opinion of this court. Thé cause was tried iii the coürt below¿ before Archer, Ch. J. and Hanson and Ward, J'. and came to this court on three bill's of exception's, taken to their opinions by the.appellant, who was the plainiilF below.
1Opinion of the CourtDorsey, J.
The counsel on both sides, in the argument of this cause, have displayed great professional ability, and much labour of research; and the deep interest which the commercial part of our community take in subjects of this nature, have induced the court to give the matters in controversy their most serious consideration. In the progress of the trial in, Baltimore county court, three bills of exceptions were taken by the counsel for the plaintiff, the first of which presented the following statement of facts on his part: “That -on the 23d of May 1820, he obtained insurance on the cargo of the…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Citizens' Fire Insurance, Security & Land Co. v. DollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Franklin Fire Insurance v. Chicago Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Anne Arundel County v. Fraternal Order of Anne Arundel Detention Officers & PersonnelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Eisel v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.