Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Baltimore Brick Co. v. John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 2, 1945No. Civil Action 2364PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
This is a suit under the Miller Act § 1, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a, brought by the manufacturer and supplier of the material, Baltimore Bride Company, against the subcontractor, J. Friedman Company, and the general contractor’s surety, in connection with work, on a government project involving the construction of certain dormitories and other buildings at Jarboesville, St. Mary’s County, Maryland.
For the reasons about to be stated I find that the Brick Company is entitled to recover in this case the amount of its claim, namely, $5,655.20, with interest from the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arthur N. Olive Co., Inc. v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Dan C. Marino, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Montecatini Edison, S.P.A. (A Corporation of Italy) v. Karl Ziegler, and E. I. Dupont De Nemours and Company (A Corporation of Delaware)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- D. A. Parrish & Sons v. County Sanitation District Number 4California Court of Appeal · 1959
- S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Havens Steel Co. v. Randolph Engineering Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.