Legal Opinion

Kenner v. Schmidt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, j.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment which dismissed his action for damages on the ground that it was not commenced within the time limited by law. The case involves the interpretation of ORS 12.030, which provides when an attempt to commence an action is equivalent to the commencement thereof.

Plaintiff’s cause of action against defendant for damages for personal injuries accrued on June 8,1962. The two-year statute of limitations applied. ORS 12.110. The complaint in this action was filed on June 2, 1964, with the county clerk of Wasco county, in which defendant resided. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Lane v. BallOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Mutzig v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Dutro v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Cohoes Bronze Co. v. Georgia Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Green v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Card v. PipesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004
  3. Dewey A. Hunt, Sr., Individually and as Personal Representative of Altha H. Hunt, Deceased v. Broce Construction, Inc., a Domestic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  4. Adkins v. WatrousCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Moser v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API