Legal Opinion
Fisherman's Wharf Bay Cruise Corp. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 15, 2003No. A101652PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, J.
I
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Fisherman’s Wharf Bay Cruise Corporation, doing business as Red and White Fleet (Red and White), competes against its sole and dominant competitor, real party in interest Blue and Gold Fleet, Inc. and affiliated entities (collectively, Blue & Gold), in providing regularly scheduled sightseeing tours on San Francisco Bay (bay cruises). Red and White filed an antitrust lawsuit against Blue & Gold, alleging six causes of action based on California’s Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16700 et seq.) and the Unfair Practices Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, §…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News America Marketing FSICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Noe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.