In re Multidistrict Litigation Involving Banking Agreements with Stirling Homex Corp.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
This litigation consists of four actions in four districts brought by former controlling officers and shareholders of Stirling Homex Corporation. The defendants in all of the actions are members of a banking consortium with whom Stirling and a subsidiary dealt in attempting to secure adequate financing for their operations. Plaintiffs allege that the nine defendant banks violated *573the federal securities laws and committed common law fraud by falsely representing their intention to extend credit to Stirling and its subsidiary. The complaints in each of the actions also contain…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re Great Western Ranches LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Westec CorporationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- In Re Stirling Homex Corporation Securities Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
4Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Stirling Homex Corporation Securities Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- Goss v. Crossley (In re Hawaii Corp.)District Court, D. Hawaii · 1980