Legal Opinion
Borel v. County of Contra Costa
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1990No. A042462PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLMDAHL, J. *
Property owner challenges the method used to assess his property.
The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with directions to return the matter to the Assessment Appeals Board of Contra Costa County for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
Statement of Facts and Procedural History
This case involves a dispute over the assessed value of a 17.234 acre parcel of land located within the City of Danville (hereafter, Danville). Appellant Armand Borel’s family purchased the property in 1923. The property is zoned for agricultural use (A-3), and is used for a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Sierra Club v. City of HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Kelsey v. ColwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Lewis v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Jones v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- County of Humboldt v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001