Lowrie v. Castle
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPvTJGG, C. J.
There were three counts in the declaration as originally filed, all in contract. The writ stated the cause of action to be in contract. Subsequently the plaintiff was allowed to amend by substituting a new third count and by adding a fourth count (later eliminated by the sustaining of a demurrer thereto without exception or appeal), and a fifth count in contract, and by inserting in the writ after the words “in an action of contract,” the words “or tort, all counts being for one and the same cause of action.” Still later counts six and seven in tort for fraud and deceit were added against the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Midland Hotel Corp. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary v. QLT Phototherapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.