Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Pearson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 19, 2007PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The plaintiff, Kevin O’Brien, brought this claim against* John Pearson and Margaret Palm2 (defendants), his fel*378low shareholders in the closely held corporation Summerhill Estates, Inc., for breach of fiduciary duty. The jury concluded by special question that O’Brien was a forty-eight per cent shareholder in the corporation, and awarded him $900,000 on his breach claim. A Superior Court judge denied the defendants’ motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The Appeals Court reversed the judgment, O’Brien v. Pearson, 67…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Everett v. 357 Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Global Investors Agent Corp. v. National Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  3. Reading Co-Operative Bank v. Suffolk Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  4. Merriam v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Windross v. Village Automotive Group, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API