O'Brien v. Pearson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.
The plaintiff, Kevin O’Brien, brought this claim against* John Pearson and Margaret Palm2 (defendants), his fel*378low shareholders in the closely held corporation Summerhill Estates, Inc., for breach of fiduciary duty. The jury concluded by special question that O’Brien was a forty-eight per cent shareholder in the corporation, and awarded him $900,000 on his breach claim. A Superior Court judge denied the defendants’ motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The Appeals Court reversed the judgment, O’Brien v. Pearson, 67…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Everett v. 357 Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Global Investors Agent Corp. v. National Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Reading Co-Operative Bank v. Suffolk Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Merriam v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Windross v. Village Automotive Group, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.