Legal Opinion
Michael D. Potence v. Hazleton Area School District Geraldine S. Shepperson Hazleton Area School District
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 2, 2004No. 03-1535, 03-2647PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
The Hazleton Area School District (the “School District”) appeals from the Amended Judgment and Order in favor of appellee Michael D. Potence pursuant to a jury verdict that the School District had violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. It also appeals from the award of attorneys’ fees.
We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because we believe the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the School District’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, and in denying…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Keith A. Hill v. Borough of Kutztown and Gennaro Marino, Mayor of Kutztown, in His Individual and Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Smith v. City of AllentownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Fasold v. JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Finjan, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Richard J. Kautz v. Met-Pro CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.