Legal Opinion

Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 16, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2007-0470Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DENISE M. CLARK, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. Civil Action No. 07-470 (JDB) FEDER SEMO and BARD, P.C., et al., Defendants/Counter-Claimants DENISE M. CLARK, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. MUCH SHELIST DENENBERG AMENT & RUBENSTEIN, P.C., et al., Third-Party Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Denise Clark initiated this action against Feder, Semo and Bard, P.C. ("Feder Semo"), the Feder Semo retirement plan ("retirement plan" or "plan"), and plan trustees Joseph E. Semo and Howard M. Bard (collectively "defendants"). Clark asserts…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API