Legal Opinion

Kohl v. Loefgren (In Re Loefgren)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 27, 2003No. 3-19-10481PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CRABB, Chief Judge.

Timothy Kohl appeals from an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, concluding that appellant had not shown “cause” under Fed. R. Bankr.P. 4004(b) to receive an extension of time to file a complaint objecting to the discharge of a debt. Because the bankruptcy court’s order disposed of appellant’s objection, it is a final order for the purpose of 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) and is appealable as of right. See Matter of Riggsby, 745 F.2d 1153 (7th Cir.1984) (“[D]ismissal by the bankruptcy judge of a complaint objecting to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Andrew J. Kontrick, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. David J. Diersen v. Chicago Car ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Riggsby v. RiggsbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Educational Credit Management Corp. v. BuchananDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2002
  5. In Re FarhidDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Securities America, Inc. v. Tallman (In Re Tallman)District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
  2. In re SheppardBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. Rahmi v. TrumbleDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2011
  4. Helmstetter v. HerzogDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API