Legal Opinion
David J. Diersen v. Chicago Car Exchange
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 13, 1997No. 96-1588PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
David Diersen filed a complaint against the Chicago Car Exchange (“CCE”), an automobile dealership, alleging that the CCE fraudulently furnished him an inaccurate odometer reading when it sold him a 1968 Dodge Charger, in violation of the Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (“the Odometer Act” or “the Act”). 49 U.S.C. § 32701 et seq. (formerly 15 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.). The Odometer Act requires all persons transferring a motor vehicle to give an accurate, written odometer reading to the purchaser or recipient of the transferred vehicle. Under the Act, those who…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Amcast Industrial Corporation and Elkhart Products Corporation v. Detrex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Sidney Morse v. R. Clayton McWhorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Tai Kwan Cureton v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Lesley A. PARKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS OF ILLINOIS, INC., D/B/A the Helm Group, Inc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Cureton v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Horwitz v. Holabird & RootIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.