Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kent Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 3, 1953No. 17036PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone

On February 18, 1946, Kent Oil Company brought action in this state against Joe Smith on a promissory’ note dated January 12, 1939, and payable on or before January 12, 1940, at Salina, Kansas. Both by motion to dismiss and by answer, defendant set up the statute of limitations. Upon trial of the case, plaintiff introduced evidence only that the note had been executed and delivered by defendant; that it was held by plaintiff company and that defendant had resided at Goodland, Kansas, but “had left there in 1942.” Thereupon defendant again moved for dismissal, which was denied, and judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Wolf v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Newton v. MannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Fern v. CrandellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. BettsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Davis v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Garrett v. Arrowhead Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Pride v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Bailey v. ClausenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Citizens State Bank v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API